Nicole Junkermann on Care, Data and Trust, October 2026

Care and information have become hard to separate, which makes trust the quality everything else rests on. A short list of the habits that tend to hold, and why they are worth the effort.

Care and information have become difficult to separate. Almost every helpful thing that happens in health now leaves a record somewhere, and the record is rarely neutral: information about a person's health is information about their life, their work, their family and their plans. Nicole Junkermann regards that as the reason trust is not one consideration among several in this field but the one the others rest on.

The encouraging part is that trust is not mysterious. It is produced by a fairly short list of ordinary habits, none of which require anything clever, and all of which are noticeable by their absence.

• Say plainly what is collected and why, in language a person reading quickly can follow, and say it before it is collected rather than afterwards.
• Ask for what is needed and nothing more, on the principle that information gathered without a purpose is a liability rather than an asset.
• Make leaving as easy as joining. Confidence rises, rather than falls, when someone can see the exit clearly and chooses not to use it.
• Treat a correction as normal. People remember how an organisation behaves when something in the record is wrong far longer than they remember it being right.

What these have in common is that they are about respect rather than technology. None of them is difficult to implement. All of them are easy to postpone, which is why the field tends to divide into those who did the plain work early and those who explained afterwards why it had not been a priority.

There is a particular reason this matters in women's health. A good deal of what is now being understood properly was, for a long time, under-described and under-recorded, and the correction depends on people being willing to contribute what they know about their own experience. That willingness is not automatic and it is not owed. It is extended when the handling is careful and withdrawn when it is not, and the whole correction moves at the speed of that willingness.

Nicole Junkermann has written before about how this looks from the individual side rather than the institutional one, in the earlier note on privacy in women's health. The view has not changed much since: the technical questions are largely settled and the difficult questions are about conduct.

It helps, too, that careful handling and good care point the same direction. A record that is accurate, current and understood by the person it describes makes the actual work easier, not harder. The human stories are full of small examples of that, and of the opposite.

The companion note on why healthtech rewards patience makes a related point about pace. Trust accumulates slowly and is spent quickly, and October, with its long list of things being announced, is a reasonable month to remember which of the two is harder to replace.

← Back to the blog